Syndicate content

BRD4 Inhibitors, AML, Enhancers; Cancer Vulnerability to BRD4 Inhibition Enhanced by Weak WNT Signaling; Loss of PRC2 Complex Increases Cancer Resistance to BRD4 Inhibition

BRD4 inhibitors are among the most promising new agents in cancer therapy and they are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. BRD4 is a member of the BET (bromo- and extra-terminal (BET) family of proteins: BRD2 (bromodomain-containing protein 2), BRD3 (bromodomain-containing protein 3), and BRD4 (bromodomain-containing protein 4). In a study published online on September 14, 2015 in Nature, a team of researchers at the Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP) and Boehringer Ingelheim. both in Vienna, Austria reveals how leukemia cells can evade the deadly effects of BRD4 inhibition. The article is titled “Transcriptional Plasticity Promotes Primary and Acquired Resistance to BET Inhibition.” Understanding this adaptation process could aid the development of sequential therapies to outsmart resistant leukemias. Over the past years, scientists have drawn an almost complete map of mutations in cancer. However, translating complex genetic knowledge into effective cancer therapies turns out to be a major challenge for modern medicine. Searching for new ways to attack cancer cells, the laboratory of Dr. Johannes Zuber at the IMP in Vienna uses so-called functional genetic screens to probe vulnerabilities of cancer cells in a systematic and unbiased way. The major goal is to find genes that cancer cells particularly depend on, and then exploit these “Achilles’ heels” for the development of targeted therapies. In a first study applying this technology, Dr. Zuber and his former colleagues at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) (New York) in 2011 found that the gene BRD4 is such an “Achilles’ heel” in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive form of blood cancer. This discovery sparked much excitement about BRD4 as a new target for leukemia therapy, and, only four years later, several BRD4 inhibitors have entered clinical trials, some of which have yielded reported promising results. Despite this rapid advance, doctors and researchers still do not understand why some cancers are so sensitive to BRD4 inhibitors, while others remain resistant. “After discovering a new Achilles’ heel, we often have no clue why cancer cells depend on a certain gene, although this knowledge would be crucial for developing targeted therapies and selecting the right patients,” explains Dr. Zuber.

In the case of BRD4, finding an answer to this question turned out to be particularly challenging. To tackle this problem, Dr. Zuber and his group at the IMP teamed up with previous co-workers in the U.S. and scientists at Boehringer Ingelheim in Vienna led by Dr. Norbert Kraut to characterize sensitive and resistant cancer cells.

Results from this work have been published in the current Nature article and reveal a fascinating new mechanism as to how leukemia cells evade their dependency on BRD4. As a known regulator of transcription, BRD4 controls the activity of hundreds of genes, which are simultaneously turned off after inhibitor treatment. In leukemia, one particularly important gene controlled by BRD4 is the MYC oncogene, which leukemia cells need for their indefinite growth. Treatment with BRD4 inhibitors shuts off this important cancer gene, and leukemia cells either die or develop into normal blood cells.

To better understand why only certain leukemia subtypes are sensitive to BRD4 inhibition, Dr. Zuber and his colleagues first performed a genetic screen and found that loss of the so called PRC2 complex, which is known to inactivate genes during normal development, can render leukemia cells resistant to BRD4 inhibitors.

By further characterizing these cells they found out that MYC and other BRD4-regulated genes were back on again, so leukemia cells had found a way to activate these genes in the absence of BRD4.

When the researchers then compared cells that had acquired resistance during drug treatment to leukemia cells that were resistant in the first place, they found that, in both cases, leukemia cells use very similar pathways to turn critical genes such as MYC back on and thereby escape the deadly effects of BRD4 inhibition.

“It looked as if sensitive leukemia cells just learned what resistant cells already knew,” explains postdoctoral scientist Dr. Philipp Rathert, who spearheaded the study together with Mareike Roth, a graduate student in the Zuber laboratory.

One particularly important pathway turned out to be WNT signalling, which is known to activate MYC in colon cancer and other cancer subtypes.

To look at the regulation of MYC in even more detail, Dr. Zuber was able to take advantage of close interactions with Dr. Alexander Stark at the IMP, whose laboratory has recently developed a method called “STARR-seq.” This technology has revolutionised the study of so-called “enhancers,” which are DNA regions involved in gene regulation.

Using this new method, the team found that resistant leukemia cells activate MYC through a very small enhancer region that is bound by WNT components and gains activity following BRD4 inhibition.

To explore whether this detailed knowledge could be used to predict which patients respond to BRD4 inhibitors, the team harnessed a long-standing collaboration with the group of Dr. Peter Valent at the Medical University of Vienna.

When measuring WNT signalling markers, the team found that patient cells with low WNT activity were sensitive to BRD4 inhibitors, while high WNT activity was associated with resistance. This means the researchers may hold in their hands a first “biomarker” for predicting the success of BRD4 inhibitor therapy.

Collectively, the study reveals that leukemia cells can become resistant to BRD4 inhibitors by rewiring the regulation of critical BRD4 target genes. This “transcriptional plasticity” highlights an emerging mode of drug resistance that is distinct from established resistance mechanisms such as mutations in binding pockets or drug elimination through efflux pumps.

While this showcases once more that cancer cells can adapt to targeted therapies, Zuber and his colleagues at the IMP and Boehringer Ingelheim believe that a better understanding of these adaptation mechanisms will lead to combination therapies that will ultimately outsmart cancer cells.

“We now have learned that cancer cells can adapt to targeted therapies, but their repertoire of escape routes is quite limited”, comments Dr. Zuber on the implications of their study.

“A better understanding of the common escape routes will allow us to predict the next effective targeted therapy, so that we are always one step ahead of the cancer cell.”

[Press release] [Nature abstract]